Connect with us

Election Theft


Gateway Pundit



This is a HUGE development!

Three different states toured the Arizona Audit floor on Tuesday afternoon.

Representatives from Georgia, Alaska and Colorado toured the facility!


On Tuesday Morning, OAN’s Christina Bobb reported that delegations from Georgia, Alaska, and Colorado are inside of the Veterans Memorial Coliseum for a tour of the historic Arizona audit process. 

They are now on the floor for a deep dive into this process and it’s logistics.

The Gateway Pundit reported Monday that Georgia would tour the Veterans Memorial Coliseum as more states were expected to follow.

UPDATE on Arizona Audit: Georgia Team Is Coming Tomorrow – OAN Reporter Christina Bobb Says More States May Be Coming

More states did follow as we have two surprise guests, Colorado and Alaska.

Legislators from these three states received a “classroom style” briefing, and are now on the floor to see firsthand, how this process is run. 

These lawmakers are analyzing the audit to make any fixes necessary and implement a similar process at home.

TGP’s Jordan Conradson spoke with Senate Liasion Ken Bennett for another update before the guests arrived on the floor.

Jordan Conradson: I understand Georgia is in the house right now?

Ken Bennett: There’s a couple of legislators from Georgia and one from Alaska that are in the building right now. I’ve heard Virginia, I’ve heard Wisconsin, you’ve now told me, Colorado, Nevada was in a few days ago, Pennsylvania last week. It’s becoming a popular place.

Conradson: Are you expecting to have, over the next few days, more tours?

Bennett: I’m told that every day this week there is some elected official coming in from some state. Today is Tuesday and if that pattern continues well have somebody in Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday.

Conradson: It looks like they’re starting to max out on forensic tables, correct?

Bennett: We are beyond 80% I’m told, as far as counting the ballots, which is the first step. Then, it goes to the paper evaluation and they are well behind the counting levels in paper evaluation. I’m told that we’ll probably be finished with the counting of the ballots by the end of this week or sooner, and then all of the resources will shift to the paper evaluation. You can already see that paper evaluation has been increased significantly. There’s now 32 working tables and another probably 16 positions on the floor awaiting equipment and things like that. Once the counting is over this week at some time, all resources will shift to the paper evaluation.

As the Audit finishes, more states are coming to AZ in order to witness this process and take it home. The Gateway Pundit’s Jordan Conradson will be at the audit every day to provide updates on this strikingly important process.

Read More

Election Theft

Steve Bannon: Georgia Will Hold a Forensic Audit – Three Republican Senate Seats Are Coming Back after Full Forensic Audit Completed (VIDEO)




Georgia Radio Host John Fredericks joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Friday.  John Fredericks is reporting from the Georgia Republican Convention this weekend.

During the conversation, former Trump Chief Strategist Steve Bannon laid out his most recent predictions and they are explosive.

Steve Bannon says Georgia WILL hold a forensic audit despite the best efforts from RINOs in the state block the process.

Steve also called out Mitch McConnell to put “his shoulder to the wheel” of the Three November Movement.

TRENDING: HAPPENING NOW: Violent Minneapolis Black Lives Matter Mob Loots Sneaker Shop, Target, Walgreens, CVS and More (VIDEOS)

Steve Bannon: And what that means is holding audits in all these states. Mitch McConnell right now should not be kowtowing to Chuck Schumer. Because we’re going to show in Arizona and we’re particularly going to show in Georgia, those are three Republican Senate seats that are coming back to Republicans after you do a full forensic audit!

That ought to create a panic on MSNBC today!

Read More

Continue Reading

Election Theft

BOOM! Mike Lindell Files Fed Lawsuit Against Dominion and Smartmatic For “Weaponizing the court system” To SILENCE Lindell And Others About Election Fraud

Gateway Pundit



100 Percent Fed UP – The popular My Pillow CEO, whose incredible story of how Jesus Christ saved him from his addictions to gambling, alcohol, cocaine, and eventually crack cocaine, has been fighting to uncover and election fraud since November 5, 2020.

On the morning after the election, Americans were stunned to discover Trump’s incredible lead had evaporated in critical swing states where the counting of absentee ballots suddenly stopped, and then, in the wee hours of the morning, when the counting resumed, Joe Biden suddenly and inexplicably had taken the lead over Trump in multiple states.

TRENDING: HAPPENING NOW: Violent Minneapolis Black Lives Matter Mob Loots Sneaker Shop, Target, Walgreens, CVS and More (VIDEOS)

Along with millions of other Americans, Lindell has refused to accept the results of the election and are not giving up on their fight to examine and expose what happened in the nation’s most hotly contested election.

If Joe Biden If he truly is the president who received the most votes in the history of the United States, where’s the fanfare?

Where’s the typical in-your-face taunting from Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff that we’re used to seeing with the Democrats, even when they’re wrong?  Why aren’t Democrats aren’t gloating over Joe Biden’s “historical” election victory?

The Intellectual Conservative makes some very powerful points in a recent blog post- Riddle me this: If voter fraud didn’t occur and Brainless Biden received so many votes – more than Obama – where was all the celebration?  He literally would be the greatest Democrat in the modern era.

This isn’t just a win! This is a MANDATE. The voters have spoken. We want Joe to save America. Save the World. Save the Universe.

Yet no one, No One, NO ONE uttered the key word: Mandate. Not Nancy, Not Chuck, Not Kamala – though she made it to the top by going on lots and lots of “Man-Dates” – Great role model for aspiring women looking to break through the glass ceiling.

Brainless Biden, when criticized on policy, never, ever says the people spoke via the ballot. They want what I and the Democrats want; they believe in our policies, and we only answer to them. Not some small group of naysayers.

Liberals don’t gloat, don’t yell and scream, don’t say Mandate every other word. Why? They were obviously concerned about their voter fraud.

You can only make these statements immediately after the election, not four months later. They knew their over-the-top narrative could bite them in the ass if fraud was legally discovered and overturned the results. Simply wasn’t worth the risk.

This brings us to state audits. If you truly believe your candidate won, why use every tool in your legal briefcase to stop recounts? This isn’t logical. Wouldn’t you want the public to see Brainless Biden truly won the election? And audits would do just that – verify the enormous quantity of votes he received.

Instead, the Liberals fight tooth-and-nail at the mere mention of fraud. Look at their actions in Arizona, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin to name a few. The Lefties literally do not want the votes to be recounted. WHY?

Mike Lindell, along with a team of investigators, have been relentless in their efforts to uncover what happened behind the scenes in our election. His reward? Dominion Voting machines are suing him for daring to question if someone or some group manipulated the voting machines to affect the outcome of the November election. It’s not just Mike they’re suing. Dominion is suing Mike’s company, My Pillow, as well. They didn’t stop with Mike and his company; Dominion is also suing individuals who shared stories of what they saw on election day that concerned them, like internet connectivity and ballots being run and re-run through the tabulators. Media outlets and attorneys that dared to question the integrity of the machines used in our elections are also being sued, and Dominion doesn’t appear to be suing to make a point; they’re suing to ruin lives. In addition to Mike Lindell being sued for $1.3 billion, Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell are also being sued for over $1 billion. Journalists and media personalities like Fox News’s Lou Dobbs, Judge Jeanine, and Maria Bartiromo have also been sued for discussing the possibility of voter fraud that took place by using the voting machines.

On April 19, Mike Lindell debuted his free speech network, Frank Speech, or His first guest on the debut of his new social media platform is one of America’s most prominent constitutional lawyers, Alan Dershowitz.

With Dershowitz, Mike opened his “Frank-a-Thon” by announcing that “My Pillow” is suing Dominion for $1.6 billion for violating their First Amendment Right.

Dershowitz explained why Dominion is guilty of violating the First Amendment Rights of Mike Lindell as well as the rights of the media to report the news: “We’re gonna sue you and put you out of business, and we’re not even going to let you see our source codes so you can see what we’re suing you about.”

Dershowitz blasted Dominion for refusing to share its source code. “It’s as if My Pillow ere accused of having some secret poison in its formula, and you couldn’t tell it by just looking at the pillow, and then somehow My Pillow said, we’re not going to give your our formula, we’re going to hide it from you. That’s what they’re trying to do. They’re trying to hide what they’re doing—at the same time that they’re trying to prevent you from entering the marketplace of ideas. They’re in the marketplace of ideas. They’re not only in the marketplace of ideas; they’re in the economic marketplace too. They’re to shut you out of being able to sell your products in stores. They’re trying to silence you, and they’re doing it as the government of the United States. That’s why I’m in this case.

“Dominion is the government for purposes of the lawsuit,” Dershowitz said, as he explained that the government was using Dominion machines to tabulate our votes. Mike told his audience, “This could be one of the most important First Amendment cases in the history of the United States.”

Dershowitz warned about Dominion threatening the media, individuals, and businesses like My Pillow over discussing their product in relation to the November election results. “No wonder where you stand on the fairness of the election, we should still be on your side of the lawsuit,” Alan Dershowitz said.

He also explained how Dominion, who he claims is acting as a government agent, has threatened the media with massive lawsuits over discussing the Dominion case, adding, “You don’t have to be a conservative” to see that what Dominion is doing is wrong, saying they are “misusing the power given to them to by the government to suppress free speech.” “Dominion is a government actor,” Dershowitz explained. “It is our right to look at Dominion’s source codes,” he said, adding that they will be demanding access to the Dominion codes, saying, “I think we’ll get to look at those machines.”

Photo shows missing seals on voting machines in Antrim Co. MI days after the November election.

Today, Mike Lindell announced that he’s suing both Dominion and Smartmatic voting machines in a Minnesota federal court, accusing them of a “lawfare campaign.” Mike claims the voting machine companies are “weaponizing the judicial system and the litigation process to silence dissent, unpopular beliefs, or facts inconveniently out-of-line with mainstream groupthink.”

MSN – The latest filing from Lindell, which, like the first, seeks a trial by jury, lists Dominion, Smartmatic, and related corporations as defendants in a bid to stop them from “weaponizing the litigation process to silence political dissent and suppress evidence showing voting machines were manipulated to affect outcomes in the November 2020 general election.”

Mike claims that he is “entitled to recover his actual and special damages from Dominion and Smartmatic for their collective role in their conspiracy and enterprise to harm him — damages which presently are estimated to exceed $2 billion.”

The list of alleged offenses includes Dominion abusing the legal process given their suit against him, defamation, violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, violations of the “Support and Advocacy” clause of U.S.C. §1985(3), deprivation of civil rights under the guise of state law, and civil conspiracy. Similarly, It accused Smartmatic of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, violations of the “Support and Advocacy” clause of U.S.C. §1985(3), and civil conspiracy.

“Lindell will prove that the Dominion Defendants, acting in concert and as part of an unlawful enterprise alongside the Smartmatic Defendants, have weaponized the court system and the litigation process in an attempt to silence Lindell’s and others’ political speech about election fraud and the role of electronic voting machines in it,” the lawsuit states. “In the specific context of political speech about something as vital to a republican form of government as election integrity, no litigant should be permitted to use the courts and the litigation process as a bludgeon to suppress and stifle dissent.”

Both Dominion and Smartmatic, companies that manufacture, distribute, and maintain voting hardware and software, have long denied that their machines were tampered with in any way or that the results of the election had been compromised.

What do you think? Should private companies who are charged with ensuring their machines provide free and fair elections for Americans be suing Mike Lindell, journalists, and individuals who question if the voting machines were tampered with? Wouldn’t it make Americans feel a lot better if the voting machine companies simply agreed to allow their machines to be forensically audited as a way to be fully transparent?

We don’t know if the voting machines were responsible for massive fraud in the November election or not, but wouldn’t it make everyone feel a whole lot better if Dominion would stop suing people and start opening up their machines to be scrutinized by experts, thereby leaving no doubt that voter fraud did or did not occur in the November election that sent a semi-senile man to the White House who campaigned from his basement and couldn’t even draw a crowd of 20 to his rallies?

Costco, Kroger, Kohl’s Bed Bath & Beyond, Sam’s Club, JC Penney, and other woke big box stores have all stopped carrying My Pillow products over CEO Mike Lindell’s refusal to back down on his fight to expose voter fraud.

Supporters of Mike Lindell have been holding regular protests at local big box stores that have stopped carrying My Pillow products.

“Costco basically did a slow cancellation, slower than the other stores,” Lindell said in a phone interview.

The decision will cost My Pillow between $4 million and $10 million in annual sales, according to Lindell.

It will also affect some 40 salespeople who would travel to Costco stores to hawk the company’s products, he said. Lindell said he has offered those staffers other jobs at My Pillow, though “we did have to lay some off.”

Lindell said Costco did not explain the move, but he thinks it was related to what he calls the “cancel culture” that influenced other companies.

You can support Mike Lindell by purchasing his products directly at…If you use the special 100GP Discount code, you can receive up to 66% off at checkout. 

Put “100GP” in the “promo” box at and you can get up to 66% off, plus 100 Percent Fed Up and the Gateway Pundit will benefit from the purchase.

You may not know that has much more than pillows.

There are also:

Dog Beds

MyPillow Dog Beds are made with the same patented fill as a MyPillow to help keep your dog cool and comfortable. The inner bed and removable, zippered cover are both washable and dryable. MyPillow Dog Beds come with a limited 10-year warranty.

Click here to see more of MyPillow Dog Beds!

Women’s and Men’s Slippers

Mike’s MySlippers are wonderful to wear.

Mike says: “When I created my new MySlippers I wanted it to have everything you could need in a slipper. I wanted a slipper that was more comfortable than anything before it but also durable enough to wear all day, indoors and outdoors. That’s why I developed an exclusive 3-tier cushioning system that combines two layers of foam with a patented impact gel to keep you from wanting to ever take them off. But I didn’t stop there, I finished my MySlippers with beautiful leather suede, cozy faux fur linings, and an indoor/outdoor sole. I guarantee these will be the most comfortable slippers you’ll ever own!”

I’m wearing My Pillow slippers right now and they are the most comfortable slippers I have ever owned! – Patty, 100 Percent Fed Up

Click here to see MySlippers!

And MyPillow’s beach towels are:

  • 100% Giza Egyptian cotton

  • Extremely durable

  • Great for beach, pool, or bath

  • Machine washable & dryable

Click here to see more of Mike’s beach towels.

To get discounts and help support 100 Percent Fed Up, use this code at checkout: “100GP”

Thank you for supporting Mike Lindell by purchasing his products directly and when you use our “100GP” code, you’re also supporting 100 Percent Fed Up!

Read More

Continue Reading

Election Theft

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Democrat Non-Profits and Secret State Election Groups Met with the UN to Discuss 2020 Election Cybersecurity – Now Same Groups Are Working Against State Audits

Gateway Pundit



Members of some of the Democrat’s most connected non-profits met with UN officials before the 2020 election.  Now the same groups are trying to derail the audits moving forward across the nation.

What were Harri Hursti, Ph.D., election cybersecurity expert and computer scientist, and Elizabeth Howard, Esq., Cybersecurity and Elections Counsel at the radical Brennan Center for Justice in Manhattan, doing when they gave a briefing on election cybersecurity to a U.N. committee of international election observers in Washington, D.C., just three days before the U.S mid-term elections in 2018?

Hursti was recently in the news after being selected one of three auditors in the partisan audit team selected by New Hampshire officials.  Hursti’s fellow auditors who selected him for the job have ties to both Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D).  This group just finished auditing the Town of Windham’s 2020 election and, after observing that team’s unprofessional audit practices, citizens are now demanding a statewide forensic audit of all of NH’s elections.

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: The Windham, New Hampshire 2020 Election Audit Was Over Before It Started – Two of Three Auditors Have Conflicts with Pelosi and Schumer

TRENDING: HAPPENING NOW: Violent Minneapolis Black Lives Matter Mob Loots Sneaker Shop, Target, Walgreens, CVS and More (VIDEOS)

Liz Howard, like Marc Elias from DNC-favored Perkins Coie, is one of the elite, activist, election attorneys the far-left deploys whenever tough election issues of the national Democratic machine need fixing. Case in point, she is one of the three observers the Soros-backed Arizona Secretary of State (SoS) Katie Hobbs (D) specifically deployed to the floor of the Veterans Memorial Coliseum, site of the Arizona Senate’s forensic audit, to be her eyes and ears.

EXCLUSIVE: The Entity Behind the Effort to Stop the Maricopa Audit Revealed – The National Task Force on Election Crisis

Subsequently, Howard was one of the Democrat-elite signers onto an April 29, unfounded and vicious nonprofit letter of complaint – which implied there might even be criminal activity going! – to the Election Section, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice. This was one of four such attack letters sent by Democrat-co-opted U.S. nonprofits, led off by Perkins Coie on April 6, to harass Arizona Senate President Karen Fann (R), three of which Howard personally signed.

Joe Schaeffer of the World Tribune, in his November 8, 2020, nonprofit exposé, Soros-funded organizations have assisted with election security in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, exposed the Brennan Center and its radical attorneys as being “tethered to the Soros spider web” of co-opted U.S. nonprofits.

Why were Harri Hursti and Elizabeth Howard together, two-and-a-half years ago, briefing – not simply part of a panel discussion – but briefing a roomful of U.N. international election observers about election cybersecurity who, in three days’ time, were to travel across the U.S., collecting data about our mid-term elections for the U.N.?

To try and answer that question, you need to have answers to two more questions first, who from within the United States during the Trump administration in 2018 brought in the U.N. to observe our mid-term elections and why did they come back in 2020 with COVID-19 raging, for still more “observation,” this time of our presidential elections on November 3, 2020?

The U.N. committee in question is the OSCE PA / ODIHR chaired by Isabel Santos. This stands for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe  Parliamentary Assembly / the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, which “established a Limited Election Observation Mission (LEOM) to observe the 6 November 2018 mid-term congressional elections.”

A report from the OSCE PA / ODIHR states it was invited in by the government of the United States of America. The U.S. Department of State out of “respect for its relevant international obligations and OSCE commitments,” stated its commitment to assisting this committee during an April 12, 2018 address to the U.N. Permanent Council in Vienna.

Surprisingly, our own U.S. Mission to the OSCE reads right out of a globalist’s playbook, “The United States strongly supports the work of the OSCE and views it as the paramount instrument for building a region of stable, open societies in which every country lives at peace with its neighbors.

The ODIHR describes itself as the:

OSCE’s principal institution to assist participating States ‘to ensure full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, to abide by the rule of law, to promote principles of democracy and (…) to build, strengthen and protect democratic institutions, as well as promote tolerance throughout society’ (1992 Helsinki Summit Document). This is referred to as the OSCE human dimension.

The ODIHR, which conducts these election observation missions, “assesse[s] compliance of the election process with OSCE commitments and other international obligations and standards for democratic elections” and “observes elections, reviews legislation and advises governments on how to develop and sustain democratic institutions.”

This is very troubling to learn that the U.S. is supposed to comply with international standards for “democratic elections” established by this U.N. committee and that they review and even provide advice upon our own federal and states’ election laws.

The LEOM team consisted of “a 14-member core team based in Washington D.C. and 36 long-term observers.
It was joined by “an 83-member delegation of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly to form an International Election Observation Mission (IEOM) … In total, the IEOM deployed 136 observers from 34 OSCE participating States and one Partner for Co-operation.

The U.N. committee’s literature and its 2018 reports about U.S. elections are littered with the term “civil society” which, like the term “open society” should place you, who treasure and defend American sovereignty, on red alert.

It also, strangely, shares many of the same progressive election reform goals which far-left Democrats have been busy implementing all across the U.S. In fact, its overall recommendations for the U.S. elections’ processes reads like the To Do list of that spiderweb of U.S., Democrat-controlled “election integrity” nonprofits, of which the Brennan Center is the actual spider in the middle, pulling all the strings.

It appears the OSCE PA regularly deploys these international “observer delegation[s] for election day observation” to all of OSCE’s participating nations, to make sure they are towing the U.N. line and conducting their democracies’ elections in a manner proscribed by and approved of by the U.N.

Of course, we don’t have a democracy we, in the United States, we have a Constitutional Republic form of government, so take their advice with a large grain of salt or ignore it totally.

The OSCE PA ODIHR 2018 reports seemed politely irritable with the fact that there is no federal entity that oversees U.S. elections and that, instead, as per our Constitution, the states each administer the collective 10,500 or so U.S. jurisdictions. In addition, the lack of procedural uniformity in elections, from one central source, clearly disturbed this U.N. group.

The ODIHR claims to be highly credible in the field, yet in the 2018 interim report it had footnoted examples of alleged egregious pre-election statements by candidates which singled out, almost exclusively, President Donald Trump and Republican candidates!

In that same report, as examples of “active grassroots movements” leading to increased participation in elections, it only listed Black Lives Matter#MeToo and March for Our Lives, all radical, and in some cases, violent, far-left movements. They simply ignored any Conservative activity whatsoever.

This U.N. report is ginning for Washington, D.C. to be granted state status. In addition, it is a public relations arm of the National Popular Vote Act, a move by hardcore Democrats and socialists to do away with the electoral college entirely and elect U.S. presidents via the popular vote. Approved by 16 states’ legislatures and Washington D.C., the NPVA would destroy an essential component of our Constitution and it would destroy our election process.

This U.N. committee’s recommendations and reports about our 2018 elections are garbage!

The observers, called interlocutors by the U.N., many socialist-leaning themselves, have been influenced, almost exclusively so, by Democrats, and their socialist and communist allies from within the United States.

So who, from within the government of the United States of America, wanted this international election team to muck about in our elections? Why did they come back in 2020?

Officially, it was the United States Mission to the OSCE which invited in this U.N. team, backed by the Department of StateBuried within the reports, however, you find that it was two nonprofits that were singled out for special thanks by ODIHR in the text of the report: the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) and the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED). The only other entity singled out for thanks was the Dept. of State.

The ODIHR LEOM wishes to thank the authorities of the United States for the invitation to observe the elections, and the Department of State, the National Association of Secretaries of States, and the National Association of State Election Directors for their assistance.

In addition, the committee actually met with NASS and NASED officials when it did its Needs Assessment Mission from May 21-25, 2018, again, the only non-governmental organizations to be thus singled out (p. 9) in the text of the report itself.

The ODIHR LEOM commenced its work in Washington, DC, on 3 October. The Head of Mission has met with the Department of State, Department of Justice, Federal Election Commission, National Association of Secretaries of State, National Association of State Election Directors, and members of the diplomatic community, among others.

The report even cites a NASS resolution: “A National Association of Secretaries of State 2015 resolution welcomes ‘OSCE international election observers from the OSCE member countries to observe elections in states where allowed by state law’.

It is troubling and, in fact, shocking to find out, given the extreme partisanship, out-and-out corruption, and even possible criminal behavior of certain secretaries of state and election officials which we are seeing revealed, post the 2020 election, that it was NASS, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit “trade group” for secretaries of state (SoS) and NASED, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit “trade group” for election officials which appear to be the driving forces behind U.N. interlocutors, as they are called by the U.N.

These foreigners from the U.N., with a far-left bias, were inside our country’s borders, intimately examining our election systems, our election laws, our election equipment, our election cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and our actual elections!

The activities of these two nonprofits, NASS and NASED – whether governmental or something else we don’t know about – fall outside of public oversight. Where does their money come from? Where does it go to? Are they accepting foreign dollars and foreign contracts? How would we ever even know!

What are these quasi-governmental, charitable nonprofits, which are required by law to remain nonpartisan, doing behind the backs of the public?

NASS’s board is made up entirely of elected secretaries of state. NASED’s board is made up entirely of election officials, who may be chief election officers, but who are not secretaries of state.

There are no checks & balances upon the activities of these two boards and upon the nonprofits themselves. They operate outside of public scrutiny. As a telling point, both NASS and NASED are very late in submitting their IRS Form 990s, keeping the public in the dark about the little it can glean from these tax documents!

These two nonprofits represent all of the people – the leadership – which controls our elections in every state in the United States.

What if these two nonprofits have been co-opted and corrupted, as has happened to so many nonprofits in the United States? Or, what if just a handful of corrupted public election officials took control, or got control of the finances, what kind of activities might be going on, secretly, which would evade detection?

It was former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in a February 8, 2020 speech who sounded the alarm about foreign influence and aggressive deal-making occurring through the National Governors Association, in that case with the CCP.

Joe Schaeffer, again, from the World Tribune covered this story brilliantly on December 20, 2020, Arizona Gov. Ducey to China: ‘Lots of opportunities to exploit ‘our defense industry, mining and ores’.

If there is corruption and foreign influence occurring through one type of nonprofit which represents U.S. elected officials and governors, then is it a hard stretch of the imagination to believe that the same type of corruption and influence-peddling and deal-making could be occurring through NASS and NASED, which, together, represent all of our country’s top election officials, who, collectively, control our American elections.

What sort of corruption, influence peddling, and deal-making took place between the NASS, the NASED, and the U.N.’s OSCE PA / ODIHR, and what did they do that wasn’t reported on?   Within 24 hours we will provide a follow-up to this article with more shocking news.

Read More

Continue Reading